Equipment for NIPPV in neuromusculo-skeletal disease
Anita K Simonds
For patients with neuromuscular, central neurological, or chest wall disorders there are special pathophysiological considerations when choosing a ventilator which are listed in Table 1 below.
Table 1.
Disorder Pathophysiological considerations
Neuromuscular eg. old polio, myopathy Often inspiratory & expiratory muscle
muscular dystrophy, motor neurone disease weakness
Tendency to poor cough.
Atelectasis, microatelectasis.
May be bulbar weakness, aspiration
Lungs usually compliant
Condition may be progressive
Mobility and hand control may be limited
Chest wall disease eg. scoliosis, thoracoplasty Chest wall compliance low.
fibrothorax, scleroderma May be additional pulmonary fibrosis
Cough usually preserved
Bulbar function tends to be normal
Large airway distortion can occur
Condition usually non-progressive
Central neurological disease eg. Congenital Absent or reduced ventilatory drive
hypoventilation syndrome, brainstem CVA, May be bulbar weakness, aspiration
cervical cord lesion and limb weakness. Can be
progressive
positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV)?
By and large, this is not a difficult question to answer. Individuals with severe bulbar weakness, who are 24 hour ventilator dependent will require T-IPPV. However, improvement in bulbar function can occur eg. following a CVA, and gradual recovery may take place in ventilatory capacity eg after low cervical spinal cord lesion, so continued reassessment to identify those who can be stepped down to a less invasive method of support is crucial. By the same token, patients with motor neurone disease (MND/ALS) or Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) may develop progressive weakness and bulbar symptoms and require transfer for non-invasive to invasive ventilation.
It has been pointed out that 24 hour ventilator dependency is not an absolute indication for T-IPPV, as a proportion of these patients may be managed round the clock with NIV, nPV or a combination of techniques such as NIPPV, mouth ventilation and a pneumobelt. In some situations the use of NIPPV together with mechanical cough assistance may produce less pulmonary morbidity than T-IPPV. However, these judgements need to be made on a individual basis.
Negative pressure ventilation has been used for many years in small children and in the last few years, masks suitable for even neonatal use have become available. However, for babies there is little experience using long term non-invasive techniques, and so T-IPPV tends to be used especially if there are underlying conditions such as bronchopulmonary dysplasia, tracheo-bronchomalacia, congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS) or severe type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Some children with less progressive disorders may be successfully transferred to mask ventilation when a few years old. Although applied extensively in the 1940s and 50s in patients with neuromuscular disase, particularly acute poliomyelitis, negative pressure ventilation is now use rarely in adults with acute or chronic ventilatory failure. In individuals with stable chest wall or neuromuscular disease nPV may be as effective as NIPPV, but efficiency is limited by the fact it may predispose the individuals to obstructive sleep apnoea, is not readily available and often inconvenient.
Non-invasive mask ventilation is therefore the preferred option in acute exacerbations of chronic lung disease and for long term home use in those with neuromusculo-skeletal disease, providing they do not meet the criteria for T-IPPV described above. The choice of ventilator lies between volume and pressure preset devices.
Table 2 Differences between volume preset and pressure preset ventilators
Characteristic |
Volume preset
ventilator |
Pressure preset
ventilator |
Delivery |
Delivers a constant tidal volume in the face of changing airways resistance and lung compliance. |
Delivered tial volume will fall with increasing airways resistance or fall in lung compliance. |
Leak compensation |
Poor leak compensation |
Good leak compensation |
Addition of PEEP/EPAP |
Can add PEEP, but many models do not incorporate this |
EPAP available on bilevel pressure support machines |
Peak airway pressure |
Difficult to limit peak airway pressure |
Can preset maximum IPAP which can be advantageous in patients with previous pneumothorax, bullous lung disease, hyperinflation or gastic distension |
Size |
Ventilators tend to be bulky |
Usually smaller than volume preset models |
Table 3
Examples of volume and pressure ventilators
Pressure Bilevel pressure support Volume
Nippy (B&D Electromedical) BiPAP (Repironics) PV 501 (Breas)
PV 401 (Breas) Harmony (Respironics) PLV 100/102 (Lifecare)
VPAP ST (Resmed) BromptonPAC (PneuPAC)
PV 102 (Breas)
This offers the potential advantages of comfort and the presence of positive pressure in expiration (EPAP). EPAP can:
· Prevent rebreathing of CO2 (minimum EPAP of 4 cmH2O recommended with expiratory systems such as whisper swivel valve)
· Reduce the inspiratory work required to trigger inspiration in patients with intrinsic PEEP
All these attributes, apart from the ability to reduce the work of breathing in the presence of autoPEEP (rare in neuromusculo-skeletal disase) may be especially relevant to the patients with neuromuscular disease.
Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) , available on the Vision ventillator (Respironics Inc.) has recently been introduced as a mode which is responsive to the patient’s respiratory effort and therefore may aid neuro-mechanical coupling and comfort. Further work is required to see whether this is the case for chest wall and neuromuscular patients. As the mode is contingent on respiratory effort, PAV should not be used without a back-up mode in patients with depressed respiratory drive (eg. during sleep).
In triggered or assist mode the user is required to make a respiratory effort to generate a breath, whereas in assist/control mode (also known as spontaneous /timed mode) breaths can be triggered, but there is a back-up controlled automatic cycling rate which operates if the patient fails to trigger the machine for a predetermined period of time. Ventilators set in control mode deliver breaths regardless of patient effort. In most patients breathing is most comfortably and safely augmented using assist/control mode. Patients will usually trigger the ventilator during wakefulness, but many with neuromuscular and chest wall disorders are reliant on the ventilator working in control mode during sleep. Control mode may be helpful occasionally when there are major problems in reducing the PaCO2 level, or the patient suffers from primary alveolar hypoventilation syndrome.
2.
Simonds AK. Non-invasive
Respiratory Support. A practical handbook. Arnold, 2001.
3.
Kacmarek RM, Hill NS.
Ventilators for non-invasive positive pressure ventilation: technical aspects.
In: Muir J-F, Ambrosino N, Simonds A.K, eds. Noninvasive Mechanical
Ventilation. European Respiratory Monograph, 1st ed. Sheffield: European Respiratory Society Journals
Ltd, 2001: 76-105.