A Multimedia Presentation To hear the sounds click on the sound buttons. Background Chest auscultation is probably the most frequent part of clinical examination a physician undertakes in day to day work. But many feel that lung sounds are poorly taught and many recognise that there is a considerable inter-examiner disagreement on the timing and nature of lung sounds in one patient [1,2]. Physicians admit there is now a greater reliance on lung imaging than on clinical examination of the chest. But auscultation is cheap and harmless and many patients are relieves to feel the auscultation on the chest wall [3]. With appropriate eduction the recognition of normal and abnormal lung sounds will probably make this simple procedure more informative. This article is designed to explain the mechanism of lung sounds and the diseases in which they could be heard as well as giving an audio visual example of most common sounds.
The science of auscultation started when Laennec describes lung sounds that he heard through a one sided stethoscope, which he invented. he later correlated the sounds with post mortem findings. Laennec quickly realised that lung sounds were easier to recognise than to describe [4]. the invention of binaural stethoscopes provided an additional boost to this science, although initially physicians complained that "they heard too much".
Three major problems with auscultation were recognised over the years:
Terminology (nomenclature): Many physicians use different terms to describe the same sounds. Adjectives such as "wet, dry, coarse and fine" were used to describe crackles for example. Lung sound recording analysis: In 1973 microphones attached to the chest wall and linked to a tape recorder and/or an oscilloscope and a screen became available for teaching and for reference use. The initial aim was to determine the presence of lung crackles in asbestos workers. Soon analogue to digital converters were used and the data were processed through computers for analysis. The machine [Figure 1.] consists of a microphone attached to a filter to remove ambient sounds. Some machines would have a pneumotachograph to register the flow. This helps to identify inspiration and expiration in the respiratory cycle. The sound and the flow signal are converted to digital forms using an analogue to digital converter attached personal computer. the processed sounds are normally plotted as time-domain. In other words the chart is a plot of time against the amplitude ( or the intensity ) of the sound ( fig 2.) It is possible to expand the time to show details of a period a short as 1 millisecond. This helps showing crackles in a great detail. One advantage of the conversion of the analogue signal into a digital signal is that it is possible to deduce a frequency domain plot in which the frequency is a plotted against the amplitude. This is extracted using a method called fast Forrier analysis. |
Figure 1: A cartoon representing a
lung sound system. The on-line screen visualises lung sound
and flow signals while recording. This helps identifying the
area of the chest wall, which is likely to show the abnormal
lung sounds. The flow signal and the sound signal are
superimposed on each other in the final
recording.
Vesicular sounds [figure 2.] is a low pitched
sound caused by the friction of the air with the walls of the airways.
The sound is then 'modified' through passing numerous air filled alveolar
spaces and the chest wall structures.
Figure 2: Vesicular ( normal )
lung sound. A. one respiratory cycle. This is a plot of the
sound amplitude against time (time-domain). The recording is
divided into segments of 100 milliseconds duration for ease
of analysis. The flow is to help identifying inspiration and
expiration. B. A 'Zoom on' one segment of A for more
detailed analysis. C. the frequency-domain plots using fast
Forrier analysis on B. the amplitude of the sound is plotted
against frequency. This graph shows that the vesicular
sounds are by and large of low frequency ( low pitch ) <
200 Hz.
This can be divided into - continuous
lung sounds and discontinuous lung sounds. Abnormal continuous lung
sounds Wheeze Wheeze is a continuous musical sound of
>400 Hz pitch [5]. Rhonchi on the other hand is a
continuous abnormal sound of < 400 Hz. Sounds between
200-400 Hz were not classified, but the author believes that
clinicians perceive a sound of this frequency as wheeze.
Wheeze and Rhonchi are heard in asthma, chronic bronchitis
and hertz failure. Unilateral wheeze can be the result of
external compression or a partial obstruction of a large
airway. Tumors in adults and foreign bodies in children are
the major causes of unilateral wheeze. it has been suggested
that the frequency ( the pitch) of the wheeze is inversely
correlated with FEV1 [6].
Figure 3: Monophonic wheeze (430 Hz) in a patient with severe asthma.
Stridor: this is an inspiratory and expiratory sound emanating
from the larynx, the trachea or the large airways. Stridor is an alarming
sound usually signifying a partial obstruction with tumors, foreign
bodies or enlarging retro-sternal thyroid goitre. It is also heard in
patients with narrowing trachea after prolonged intubations. Stridor
in children is audible in inflammation of the glottis or the trachea. Bronchial breathing: This sound is similar to the normal
tracheal sounds. It is heard in inspiration and expiration.
Bronchial breathing can be heard in thin people in the
anterior chest wall just under the clavicle. This represents
the sound in the two main bronchi. Pathologically it is
heard over a consolidated area particularly in lobar
pneumonia. Bronchial breathing is really the sound of
relatively large airways transmitted to the chest wall by a
non aerated segment (figure 4.). Depending on which stage of
the pneumonic illness the auscultation takes place;
bronchial breathing can be contaminated with or by pleural
rubs, fine or coarse crackles.
Figure 4: production of bronchial
breathing. The sound originated from the relatively large
airways; represented by the air bronchiogram. Unlike normal
vesicular sound, which is transmitted through numerous
air-filled spaces, bronchial breathing is transmitted to the
microphone through the consolidated area.
Abnormal discontinuous lung sounds Coarse crackles these are low pitched explosive sounds
resulting from air bubbling through secretions. In
bronchiectasis destruction of bronchial walls and cartlidges
can account for coarse crackles that do not disappear or
change after coughing or after physiotherapy. coarse crackles can be heard over an area
distant from the affected bronchi of the chest wall or by
placing the stethoscope on the mouth. Coarse crackles
normally disappear or reduce in number after coughing and
after deep inspiration and expiration. Nath and Capel found
that patients with coarse crackles have an obstructive
defect of their lung function tests, which suggests an
association with airway narrowing [7]. when recorded by the time expanded wave
form analysis (figure 5) crackles have a wide first
deflection ( also called initial deflection width) of
>1.25 m.s. and two cycle duration of more than 9.32
m.s.[5]. Coarse crackles are heard in chronic bronchitis, asthma,
bronchiectasis, pulmonary oedema, and in prolonged bed rest. It is also
heard in terminally ill patients.
Figure 5: Coarse inspiratory and
expiratory crackles in a patient with bronchiectasis. In the
extended time-domain graph (12 m.s.. for the crackle on the
left and 10 m.s. for the right crackle). the frequency
domain graph shows tat the coarse crackles are low pitched
[ see the frequency domain for fine crackles for
comparison]
Fine Crackles this is a high pitched discontinuous fine
sound. Fine crackles is widely believed to be the result of
a sudden opening of partially closed and stiff small airways
and alveoli. Coarse crackles are often audible in mid to
late inspiration, and they tend to be repetitive in time and
place, which strongly suggests that they are due to changes
in solid structures [8]. in computerised lung sound
analysis crackles are narrow with an initial deflection
width of < 0.92 m.s. and of a two cycle duration of, 6.02
m.s. [5]. fine crackles are heard in patients with interstitial
lung disease, early stages of heart failure and in early stages of resolution
of pneumonia. Nath and Capel showed that fine crackles are associated
with a restrictive default of lung function [0]. in interstitial
lung fibrosis the number of crackles per respiratory cycle correlates
with the severity of the disease [ 10].
Figure 6: two respiratory cycles
showing fine mid-late inspiritory crackles in a patient with
asbestosis. A. the crackles are repetitive in time and
amplitude. B. the detailed graph shows that the crackles are
narrow and of short duration. C. the frequency domain graph
shows a large area under the curve compared with the course
crackles ( figure 5). Pleural rubs Furgacs postulated that pleural rubs are induced by
contact of surfaces of the pleura roughened by fibrin. [11].
the sound is a leathery sound usually audible in mid inspiration and
mid expiration. Pleural rubs are audible in pneumonia, connective tissue
disease affecting the pleura and pulmonary embolism or pulmonary infarction.
Bronchial rubs are often mistaken for wheeze of harsh bt=breath sounds.
pleural rubs can be inconsistent and can be associated with bronchial
breathing due to the underlying disease. this makes them sometimes difficult
to recognise.
Figure 7. Pleural rub in a patient
with rheumatoid arthritis. A. There are crackle spikes with
a more continuous sound in inspiration and expiration. the
sound is not consistent, in that it is opt recorded in the
second inspiritory cycle. B. This shows that there is a
burst of short continuous signal and a peculiar crackle-like
deflection with an M shaped large wave. C. Shows that
pleural rub is a mixed low frequency and a high frequency
sounds. References 1. Schilling RSF, Hughes JPW,
Dingwall-DeFordyce I. Disagreement between observers in an
epidemiological study of respiratory disease. Br J Med
1955:1: 65. 2. Smyllie HC, Blendis LM, Armitage P.
Observer disagreement in physical signs of the respiratory
system. Lancet 1965;2:412. 3. Rubins EH, Rubin M. Thoracic Diseases.
Philadelphia and London. WB Saunders 1961. 4. Laennec RTH. a treatise on the disease
of the dnest - translated from the French. New York
Publishing c. 1962, p319. 5. American thoracic Society Ad Hoc
Committee on pulmonary nomenclature for membership reaction.
ATS News Fall 1977; 3:5-6. 6. Braughman RP, Loudon RG.
Quantification for wheezing in acute asthma. Chest
1984;86:718 7. Nath AR. Capel LH. Inspiratory
crackles and mechanical events of breathing. Thorax
1994;29:695-698. 8. Al Jarad N, Davies SW, Logan Sinclair
R, Rudd RM. Lung crackle characteristics in patients with
asbestosis, asbestos related pleural disease and left
ventricular failure using time expanded waveform analysis -
a comparative study. Respiratory medicine 1994;
88:37-46. 9. Nath AR, Capel LH. inspiratory
crackles, early and late. Thorax 1974; 29:223. 10. Murphy RLH, Del Bono EA, Davidson F.
Validation of an automated crackles (rales) counter. Am Rev
Resp Dis 1989; 140:1017-1020. 11. Fourgacs P. Lung Sounds. 1 Ed. London
Bailliere Tendall 1978.
The WebCounter was activated on
Feb 8th 2000